!
119
No further step taken till 6til when
case before to Ansiel,
Mor March again haught case befre and by their adore libnatest
ajamist
one
prisoner
Lad as 24 Ort that the
whem the Alterney General
extradition
reported as long as ass sidence was insufficient to justify his sounded and refined the decision as to the other two to the Semitery g state.
I think that the delay in dealing with these men who have then kept in prison for
moze
month's in reprehensible
My
to it is stated and, & presume, prond that the alleged offence took place in Chinen weten and the A.G. adviser that the men
noton
tratte in Strayking for piracy pre fentium.
Proved as
prepred
disk if the
course prepend in our letter +8.0.9 Sillag
it secves probable that these
in adopted men will have to to discharged & nut banished)
A protect from the Viceroy against the discharge of the 13 prisoners, that den
who won discharged last Mamber
as a beach of the threaty.
other
Supreme
Court,
fee B
realest
Sis & Pepe Branes had
qi
д
minute ads the
with a demand for deter
seems to have remained unanswered though
Bestof
At
aucuns the submitted to him
Ew
13.5
Afelt may 15
Wingfuld
I aque interdly with me tonton
that the detection
of
in prison for recurly of
there wSELE
monites
(without time) is réputcnsible.
to peet Steps munt
tre Lecture
an absolute stop to such perecedings in future
when did we
baht
6116
thir detention
I therise
how dischinged
fiest
beau
J
the wisere should be
at ona
: bit
I should be glued to speale to
me
Mee wingfield to day
the
7.0.
ar To
letter to be Corithare to
ou
the
subject.
K
Department.
May 16/82
Please read in a 2.0. primion upon primacy
in 1876 or 77- MM. 16.5
Mr. Brainston...
Herewith 5921/77 G.w.d. 16.5
んで
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.